SUFFOLK is monitored by a network of 761 CCTV cameras, installed and maintained at a cost of more than £4.5m, according to a new report.

To send a link to this page to a friend, simply enter their email address below.

The message will include the name and email address you gave us when you signed up.

 

To send a link to this page to a friend, you must be logged in.

It reveals that Suffolk’s County Council and seven borough and district authorities have spent £4,511,374 on CCTV coverage and monitoring since 2007.

Waveney District Council has spent the most, with the bill for its 40 cameras totalling £1,467,240, while Suffolk County Council has the highest number of cameras at 313 – costing £684,003.

The civil liberties campaign group Big Brother Watch, which released the figures in a report called The Price of Privacy, says Britain had an “out-of-control surveillance culture” funded with huge sums of money that would be better spent on frontline officers.

But a Suffolk County Council spokesman said: “We are confident that we have got the level of CCTV surveillance right in Suffolk.

“CCTV makes a positive contribution to helping to combat crime in the county and helps to ensure Suffolk residents feel safe in their communities.”

A Suffolk police spokesman said CCTV was an “extremely effective tool” for investigating, detecting and deterring crime.

She said: “CCTV footage can also help the police and our partners identify and address any issues that affect the quality of life in Suffolk’s neighbourhoods.”

In December, a 19-year-old man was sentenced to five-and-a-half years in jail for the rape of a 51-year-old woman in Ipswich.

The spokesman added: “The viewing of CCTV to help secure this outcome was vital to the investigation, and the result demonstrated what a useful tool CCTV can be, assisting police to solve this and many other different types of crime.”

Nick Pickles, Big Brother Watch director, claimed CCTV was doing little to improve public safety but had made the country’s cities the most watched in the world.

He said: “Surveillance is an important tool in modern policing but it is not a substitute for policing. In too many cities across the country every corner has a camera but only a few ever see a police officer. Despite millions of cameras, Britain’s crime rate is not significantly lower than comparable countries that do not have such a vast surveillance state.”

Latest News

1 comments

  • The cameras in Lowestoft don't catch what they should do as a friends shop was covers in paint and the cameras caught nothing. Some of the cameras are on auto so all a crock has to do is watch them during the day, time the time it takes to do a full look around and back to the start, and there you go you know how long you have got. The cameras would then catch nothing and the crime has been done infront of the cameras. There useless!!!!

    Report this comment

    AJC

    Tuesday, February 21, 2012



Homes24
Jobs24
Drive24
MyDate24
MyPhotos24
FamilyNotices24
MyMoney24MyVouchers24

Click here to read more of our digital publications
Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook